Chemical leaders speaking in Houston at the World Petrochemical Conference by S&P Global said the industry has the tools and talent to solve the problems of greenhouse gas emissions and plastics pollution, but doing so will not be possible unless policymakers implement regulations that incentivize the massive investments required, said Chemweek.
The executives were careful to stress that regulations should provide clear targets and long-term certainty while leaving the precise path forward undefined.
“It’s a huge opportunity,” said Peter Vanacker, CEO of LyondellBasell. “We have never been in the business as industry players to produce granules. We’ve always been in the business to listen to our customers and provide solutions to our customers to fulfill their needs. So now, here, we have a huge journey ahead of us in a completely new world with its own supply and demand.”
Some of the technologies required have already been developed and operate at scale, but broad implementation is an economic problem.
“The good news is, technically, it’s a solvable challenge,” said Mark Costa, CEO of Eastman Chemical. He cited his company’s new 100,000 metric tons per year plant for the advanced recycling of polyethylene terephthalate (PET). “The challenge we have is how do you make this work on a more global scale and have the market structure to invest in. The opportunity here is significant, but it’s not going to be for free, right? There’s a price that has to be paid that’s a premium to a very well-established at-scale oil industry to build this kind of capability and be able to solve these problems. So you need a market structure that’s going to support this.”
Regulation is necessary to create the economic incentives that will drive the transition, the executives agreed.
“Policy is very critical,” said Karen McKee, president of ExxonMobil Product Solutions. “The most important things are clarity and certainty. You don’t really get certainty until you get into a rule making. And then you want durable policy, […] because we’re investing in projects with very long lives, and therefore just having confidence in the next two or three years of policy is oftentimes insufficient to drive an optimal answer.”
However, poorly formulated regulation can stifle rather than encourage innovation.
“I think good policy is typically technology agnostic — in other words, it is focused on solving the problem, and any solution that solves the problem should be incentivized and be brought to bear,” said McKee. “That’s very important. And I would also say that we need to be careful that we let the market work. Very often you do need some structured policy that incentivizes scale-up of new or nascent technologies. But in the end, you don’t want to create a world where subsidies are driving a solution set, because that’s not going to be sustainable in the long run.”
Vanacker agreed. “When I talk to regulators, I always try to remind them, what is the end target that you want to achieve? Could you please act as an enabler, so that we have that end target in front of us? As a European myself, we’re fully endorsing [the European Union’s] Fit for 55%, a 90% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2040, and then net-zero by 2050. But the discussion also has to be on how do we enable that, and how do we encourage the entire value chain — it’s not just our industry, but all the other players in the value chain — to make sure that we can actually achieve those targets, instead of telling us what we cannot do.”
Ongoing negotiations toward a global plastics treaty suggest the message is getting through to policymakers. The negotiations were initiated with the aim of preventing pollution of the ocean with plastic waste. Discussions soon broadened to include proposed caps on plastics production, but the focus seems to have shifted back to the target of eliminating pollution.
“I think we’re getting a better hearing, and I think we’re getting better understood,” said McKee. “We have a lot more common ground with more governments and more [nongovernmental organizations], I think, than we had before. What I got as feedback initially was a lot of suspicion about the industry. When they engaged with us, and we were really demonstrating our firm desire to meet the ambition of the global plastics treaty to eliminate additional plastic waste leaking into the environment by 2040, I think, eventually, they realized we’re sincere. […] But I think the thing that has helped us more than anything is transparency. They’re really craving transparency.”
Dow CEO Jim Fitterling was optimistic that the negotiations will lead to a treaty that allows the chemical industry to fulfill its role as a solutions provider.
“There’s nobody in the industry that I work with or talk to that doesn’t want to tackle the plastic waste problem,” he noted, “but leakage of waste into the environment doesn’t have to be solved by limiting plastic production.” Plastics demand continues to grow because they significantly benefit quality of life. They have a low carbon footprint, they are recyclable, functional and, properly managed, sustainable, he added.
“I think some of the things that will be clearly on the table in Ottawa — where you have a tremendous amount of alignment from the industry, the converters, the brand owners, the retailers and countries — is we need things like designed-for-recyclability and -reuse standards. We need effective extended producer responsibility schemes, where the money goes back to creating the circular economy, which long-term has got to be there to eliminate the plastic pollution. We’re going to need probably recycled content mandates because that will create market demand and that will drive a change in behavior at a social level. We’re going to have to [increase] access to recycling. […] We need to have an all-of-the-above, technology-agnostic approach to mechanical recycling, advanced recycling, biofuels, bio-based raw materials, biodegradable products. We need to look at everything.”
We remind, circular plastics now account for 13.5% of the content in new plastic products manufactured in Europe, according to industry association Plastics Europe (Brussels). The association today published its biennial “The Circular Economy for Plastics: A European Analysis” report, which noted that the figure means the European plastics sector is more than halfway toward the interim ambition of Plastics Europe’s Plastics Transition roadmap to use 25% of plastics from circular sources in new products by 2030.
mrchub.com