MOSCOW (MRC) -- American Chemistry Council (ACC) voiced support for the Biden administration efforts to determine the social costs of greenhouse gas emissions, but urged for methodologies that “adhere to rigorous methodology” and include “ample” channels and opportunities for public and stakeholder input, said Chemweek.
ACC was among 11 signatories on a letter sent to Biden administration officials tasked with implementing the president’s executive order (EO) 13990, Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis. Signed on 20 January, EO 13990 mandates the formation of an Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases (IWG) to update estimates of the Social Cost of Carbon (SCC), Social Cost of Nitrous Oxide (SCN) and Social Cost of Methane (SCM) using recommendations from the National Academies of Sciences (NAS). “An accurate social cost is essential for agencies to accurately determine the social benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions when conducting cost-benefit analyses of regulatory and other actions,” EO 13990 stated.
EO 13990 required the IWG to publish interim estimates of these “economically significant values” within 30 days of the EO and a final set of updated estimates by January 2022, the signatories say. “However, it is not clear what the process is to solicit public and stakeholder input for developing the interim estimates presumably by February 19, 2021 or final estimates by January 2022. For example, when updating estimates, the NAS recommends that such estimates draw on external technical expertise and that revisions be subject to public notice and comment. EO 13990 directs the IWG to consider the NAS recommendations, solicit public comment and engage with stakeholders in its activities related to the SCC, SCN and SCM."
The group also called for the administration to harmonize the SCC, SCN and SCM activities with the directives contained in the President’s “Modernizing Regulatory Review” Memorandum for Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, also issued on 20 January 2021. “That Memorandum requires the Director of Office of Management and Budget to update, as soon as practicable, the tools used by the Executive Branch to quantify the costs and benefits of regulations, including OMB Circular A-4. These include some of the same tools and methodologies that will be used to revise the SCC, SCN and SCM. The timelines for these two regulatory efforts should be complementary and should benefit from robust stakeholder input so that the resulting guidance from each is consistent with the other.”
The letter was addressed to four key officials within the Biden Administration: Robert S. Fairweather, acting director, Office of Management and Budget; Dr. Robert M. Fisher, General Counsel and Senior Economist, Council of Economic Advisers; Rachael Leonard, Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel.
Office of Science and Technology Policy; and Dominic Mancini, Deputy Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. The full list of signatories are ACC, American Forest & Paper Association, American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers, American Iron and Steel Institute, American Petroleum Institute, Council of Industrial Boiler Owners, Fertilizer Institute, Independent Petroleum Association of America, National Association of Manufacturers, Portland Cement Association and U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
As MRC informed earlier, last year, Exxon Mobil Corp announced it will lay off about 1,900 employees in the United States as the COVID-19 pandemic batters energy demand and prices.
We remind that ExxonMobil has undertaken a planned shutdown at its cracker in Singapore. The company halted operations at the cracker for maintenance on September 14, 2020. The cracker was expected to remain off-line till end-October, 2020. Located at Jurong Island, Singapore, the cracker has an ethylene production capacity of 1 million mt/year and a propylene production capacity of 450,000 mt/year.
Ethylene and propylene are feedstocks for producing polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP).
According to MRC's ScanPlast report, Russia's estimated PE consumption totalled 2,220,640 tonnes in 2020, up by 2% year on year. Only shipments of low density polyethylene (LDPE) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) increased. At the same time, polypropylene (PP) shipments to the Russian market reached 1 240,000 tonnes in 2020 (calculated using the formula: production, minus exports, plus imports, excluding producers' inventories as of 1 January, 2020). Supply of exclusively PP random copolymer increased.
MRC